Hero Icon Image

2025 Rock Integrated Services Survey

With an ever growing list of companies offering services in the Rock RMS space, we asked the community to share their experience with vendors.

Communication


Clearstream's Logo

Clearstream

Visit Website
9.3 / 10 26 Responses

Survey responses about Clearstream reflect high overall satisfaction, particularly with its ease of use, strong Rock RMS integration, and exceptional customer service. Users praised its responsive and knowledgeable support team, seamless SMS functionality, transparent pricing—especially regarding shortcode registry—and helpful onboarding experience. The platform is viewed as user-friendly for both staff and volunteers, and many noted Clearstream as a preferred alternative to Twilio due to its simplified management of messaging infrastructure. While some would like improved documentation, deeper Rock integration beyond the SMS pipeline, and a more usage-based pricing model, the consensus is that Clearstream is a reliable, well-supported, and adaptable texting solution for church communication needs.

Read More
Intulse's Logo

Intulse

Visit Website
8.8 / 10 5 Responses

Feedback on Intulse is largely positive, emphasizing its seamless integration with Rock RMS, which has improved staff communication and efficiency. Users consistently praise the company’s responsive and helpful customer support. While some have experienced occasional platform issues or noted the high cost as a drawback, overall satisfaction remains strong, with the service seen as reliable, effective, and well-aligned with church communication needs. Enhanced reporting capabilities were mentioned as a potential area for improvement.

Read More
Twilio's Logo

Twilio

Visit Website
7.5 / 10 53 Responses

Feedback on Twilio highlights its reliability, cost-effectiveness, and robust functionality, especially once the platform is properly configured. Many users appreciate its seamless integration with Rock RMS, flexibility, and strong API capabilities. However, Twilio is frequently described as complex to set up, developer-heavy, and lacking user-friendly documentation—particularly around regulatory processes like 10-DLC registration. While some churches continue using Twilio due to its low cost and “just works” dependability, others have migrated to alternatives like Clearstream or Powered by Text, seeking easier interfaces, stronger customer support, and more ministry-focused solutions. Common frustrations include limited or impersonal support, high pricing for features like short codes, and difficulties in troubleshooting. Overall, Twilio is respected for its technical power and affordability, but many users would prefer a simpler, more relational experience tailored to church needs.

Read More
Powered By Text's Logo

Powered By Text

Visit Website
7.5 / 10 2 Responses

Feedback on Powered By Text (PBT) reflects a mixed initial experience, with users noting that while the team has been helpful, responsive, and pleasant to work with, the integration capabilities with Rock RMS did not fully meet expectations. Some features discussed during early meetings were not available at launch, leading to a sense of being misled. Users expressed a desire for improved integration to align with what was originally presented.

Read More
Survey Processing Methodology

Reviews are displayed in descending order of their average rating.

All reviews in this survey were voluntarily and anonymously submitted by members of the community in response to one of three communicated requests. The responses were free from Rock Partner influence or solicitation, and Spark has refrained providing any ratings themselves. The overall ratings presented in this report represent an average of the individual scores provided by the community.

The comments provided by participants have been consistently summarized using ChatGPT using the following prompt: Below are a series of comments from a survey we did on a Rock RMS integrated partner [Partner Name]. Please summarize the comments in a way that is professional, concise, and accurate and in a single paragraph.

The summarized feedback was edited to remove specific references to any individuals or projects, or overtly negative sentiments.